PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Mothman · 2014

XX-2014ID case-926c0b9bd2First-hand accountAdded to map Oct 20, 2026
Creature
Mothman
When
May 28, 2014to the day
Where
Place unknownno dependable place
Reports
1 document1 independent

The account

Witness reports seeing a winged figure perched on a fence in their yard after hearing their dog bark.

See the source ↓ one document so far, so there is no trail to follow yet

We map claims, not creatures: this is what the sources say, not proof. How a case is built

Details

Creature
Mothman
Where
No dependable place
The account doesn't say where in words we can place, so it isn't drawn on the map; the map lists it under Cases with no resolvable place. Other Mothman reports with no place (57)
When
May 28, 2014
Account
First-hand (the witness telling it)
Backed by
1 independent source
Added to map
Oct 20, 2026
Case id
case-926c0b9bd2

Place lookups use data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via Nominatim. All credits

Source trail (1)

Every link goes to where we found the account. The earliest we found is marked; it is the earliest found, not necessarily the original.

  1. Did I see the mothman?
    Reddit · 2014-06-01
    Earliest found, not necessarily the original.

Request a correction or removal of this case

Further reading

  • The Mothman Prophecies, John A. Keel (2001)
    The 1966-67 Point Pleasant flap, by the investigator who covered it.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • Mothman: The Facts Behind the Legend, Donnie Sergent Jr. and Jeff Wamsley (2002)
    Local researchers' account of the Point Pleasant sightings.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • On the Track of Unknown Animals, Bernard Heuvelmans (1959)
    The founding work of cryptozoology.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • Cryptozoology A to Z, Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark (1999)
    Encyclopedia of reported creatures.
    Borrow on Internet Archive

Books we have not reproduced: borrow them free at archive.org. Listing a book is not an endorsement of its claims.

Discussion (0)

No comments on this case yet.

Sign in to comment.