PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Chupacabra · Winslow, Arkansas

AR-NDID case-a384dcf64cFirst-hand accountAdded to map Oct 23, 2026
Creature
Chupacabra
When
Date unknownno date given
Where
Winslow, Arkansasto town level
Reports
1 document1 independent

The account

A caller reports seeing a fast, upright, leathery creature running across the road in Arkansas after Hurricane Katrina.

See the source ↓ one document so far, so there is no trail to follow yet

We map claims, not creatures: this is what the sources say, not proof. How a case is built

Details

Creature
Chupacabra
Where
Winslow, Washington County, Arkansas, United States
mapped to town level · from the report's own words, generalized to a larger area
When
Date unknown
Account
First-hand (the witness telling it)
Backed by
1 independent source
Added to map
Oct 23, 2026
Case id
case-a384dcf64c

Place lookups use data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via Nominatim. All credits

Source trail (1)

Every link goes to where we found the account. The earliest we found is marked; it is the earliest found, not necessarily the original.

  1. Something Was Watching Them: Dogman, UFOs, Mothman & Something Worse
    YouTube · 2026-05-16
    Earliest found, not necessarily the original.

Request a correction or removal of this case

Further reading

  • Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire Beast in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore, Benjamin Radford (2011)
    Traces the 1995 Puerto Rico origin and the Texas 'chupacabras'.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • Hidden Animals: A Field Guide to Batsquatch, Chupacabra, and Other Elusive Creatures, Michael Newton (2009)
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • On the Track of Unknown Animals, Bernard Heuvelmans (1959)
    The founding work of cryptozoology.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • Cryptozoology A to Z, Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark (1999)
    Encyclopedia of reported creatures.
    Borrow on Internet Archive

Books we have not reproduced: borrow them free at archive.org. Listing a book is not an endorsement of its claims.

Discussion (0)

No comments on this case yet.

Sign in to comment.