PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Chupacabra · Berkeley County, South Carolina · 2017

SC-2017ID case-bdfc35724cAdded to map Oct 30, 2026
Creature
Chupacabra
When
Aug 2017to the month
Where
Berkeley County, South Carolinato county level
Reports
1 document1 independent

The account

[name] reports seeing a strange hairless animal while playing golf in Santee, South Carolina, which sparked debate about whether it was a Chupacabra.

See the source ↓ one document so far, so there is no trail to follow yet

We map claims, not creatures: this is what the sources say, not proof. How a case is built

Details

Creature
Chupacabra
Where
Berkeley County, South Carolina, 29431, United States
mapped to county level · from the report's own words
When
Aug 2017
Account
Not first-hand (retold or reported by someone else)
Backed by
1 independent source
Added to map
Oct 30, 2026
Case id
case-bdfc35724c

Place lookups use data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via Nominatim. All credits

Source trail (1)

Every link goes to where we found the account. The earliest we found is marked; it is the earliest found, not necessarily the original.

  1. Chupacabra sighted in South Carolina? (mixedtimes)
    Reddit · 2017-09-01
    Earliest found, not necessarily the original.

Request a correction or removal of this case

Further reading

  • Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire Beast in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore, Benjamin Radford (2011)
    Traces the 1995 Puerto Rico origin and the Texas 'chupacabras'.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • Hidden Animals: A Field Guide to Batsquatch, Chupacabra, and Other Elusive Creatures, Michael Newton (2009)
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • On the Track of Unknown Animals, Bernard Heuvelmans (1959)
    The founding work of cryptozoology.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • Cryptozoology A to Z, Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark (1999)
    Encyclopedia of reported creatures.
    Borrow on Internet Archive

Books we have not reproduced: borrow them free at archive.org. Listing a book is not an endorsement of its claims.

Discussion (0)

No comments on this case yet.

Sign in to comment.