PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Mothman · West Finchley, England · 1981

UNI-1981ID case-e40e67e1c5First-hand accountAdded to map Oct 6, 2026
Creature
Mothman
When
Jul 14, 1981to the day
Where
West Finchley, Englandto town level
Reports
1 document1 independent

The account

Witness reports seeing an immense black winged figure with no head land in a garden and then vanish.

See the source ↓ one document so far, so there is no trail to follow yet

We map claims, not creatures: this is what the sources say, not proof. How a case is built

Details

Creature
Mothman
Where
West Finchley, London Borough of Barnet, Greater London, England, N3 1AH, United Kingdom
mapped to town level · from the report's own words
When
Jul 14, 1981
Account
First-hand (the witness telling it)
Backed by
1 independent source
Added to map
Oct 6, 2026
Case id
case-e40e67e1c5

Place lookups use data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via Nominatim. All credits

Source trail (1)

Every link goes to where we found the account. The earliest we found is marked; it is the earliest found, not necessarily the original.

  1. Exclusive Interview: Mothman Sighting in West London 1981 Witness comes Forward
    YouTube
    Earliest found, not necessarily the original.

Request a correction or removal of this case

Further reading

  • The Mothman Prophecies, John A. Keel (2001)
    The 1966-67 Point Pleasant flap, by the investigator who covered it.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • Mothman: The Facts Behind the Legend, Donnie Sergent Jr. and Jeff Wamsley (2002)
    Local researchers' account of the Point Pleasant sightings.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • On the Track of Unknown Animals, Bernard Heuvelmans (1959)
    The founding work of cryptozoology.
    Borrow on Internet Archive
  • Cryptozoology A to Z, Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark (1999)
    Encyclopedia of reported creatures.
    Borrow on Internet Archive

Books we have not reproduced: borrow them free at archive.org. Listing a book is not an endorsement of its claims.

Discussion (0)

No comments on this case yet.

Sign in to comment.