PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Down the rabbit hole

Other Aquatic · Durban, KwaZulu-Natal · 1925

6 documents · 2 independent accounts

6 documents tell this story. They trace back to 2 independent accounts.

The route

  1. One encounter the reported sighting this case is about
  2. 6 documents that tell it, as we collected them
  3. 2 independent accounts behind those documents
  4. 4 copies reprints or cross-posts of the same text: not extra witnesses

Copies are not confirmations: thirty papers printing one story is still one account.

Rabbit hole: Other Aquatic · Durban, KwaZulu-Natal · 19256 documents tell this story. They trace back to 2 independent accounts. Each independent account is one row; time runs left to right. The earliest document we hold in each account is ringed. A full list follows the picture.Account 1 of 23 documents · 2 reprintsAccount 2 of 23 documents · 2 reprintsSeparate accountTIME (when each document was published) →May 1925JulSepNovJan 1926Reprint · The Thermopolis Independent (Thermopolis, Wyo.) · Image 2 of The Thermopolis independent (Thermopolis, Wyo.), April 3, 1925 · Newspaper, Apr 3, 1925The Thermopolis Indepen…Reprint · Watauga Democrat (Boone, Watauga County, N.C.) · Image 8 of Watauga Democrat (Boone, Watauga County, N.C.), June 25, 1925 · Newspaper, Jun 25, 1925Watauga DemocratEarliest found · Watauga Democrat (Boone, Watauga County, N.C.) · Newspaper, Apr 2, 1925EARLIEST FOUNDWatauga DemocratReprint · The Pageland Journal (Pageland, S.C.) · Image 4 of The Pageland journal (Pageland, S.C.), May 6, 1925 · Newspaper, May 6, 1925The Pageland JournalReprint · The Ely Miner (Ely, Minn.) · Image 4 of The Ely miner (Ely, Minn.), January 15, 1926 · Newspaper, Jan 15, 1926The Ely MinerEarliest found · The Broad Ax (Salt Lake City, Utah;Chicago, Ill.) 1895-19?? · Image 3 of The broad ax (Salt Lake City, Utah;Chicago, Ill.), April 25, 1925 · Newspaper, Apr 25, 1925EARLIEST FOUNDThe Broad AxNewspapersame text (reprint)Earliest found

Each shape is one document; open it to go to where we found it. The same graph as a list is below.

Why these records are connected

  • 4 copies: the copy detector found the same words in a later document, so it sits in the same row as the account it copies.
  • Why these documents are one case. The case matcher joined them because:
    • Watauga Democrat & The Thermopolis independent: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; same place; same year
    • The broad ax & The Pageland journal: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; same place; same year
    • Watauga Democrat & The broad ax: a person reviewed them and joined them
    • The broad ax & The Thermopolis independent: a person reviewed them and joined them
    • The broad ax & The Ely miner: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; same year (though they were placed far apart)
    • The Pageland journal & The Ely miner: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; same year (though they were placed far apart)

Every document, as a list

  1. Account 1 3 documents
  2. Account 2 (Separate account) 3 documents

How to read this

  • Time runs left to right by publication date. Very long empty stretches are cut short (the axis shows how many years were skipped); undated documents sit in their own column.
  • One row per independent account. A reprint, re-upload or cross-post carries the same text, so it stays in its account's row and never counts as a second witness.
  • Earliest found (ringed) is the earliest document we hold for that account. It is not proof of the first telling: an earlier one may exist that we haven't collected.
  • Arrows run from a document to a source it names. A dashed shape is a source a document cites that we haven't found yet; its link searches a public archive for it, and a hit there is a lead, not a confirmation.

About the numbers

  • Only documents we've collected are counted; retellings elsewhere on the web aren't counted yet.
  • Documents are matched by shared text and by the sources they name, by plain rules with no model in the loop. A match can be wrong; tell us.

The deepest rabbit holes →

Where next

Every rabbit hole → · How we tell copies from independent accounts