PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Down the rabbit hole

Bigfoot · North Adams, Massachusetts · 1879

5 documents · 1 independent account

5 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account.

The route

  1. One encounter the reported sighting this case is about
  2. 5 documents that tell it, as we collected them
  3. 1 independent account behind those documents
  4. 4 copies reprints or cross-posts of the same text: not extra witnesses

Copies are not confirmations: thirty papers printing one story is still one account.

Rabbit hole: Bigfoot · North Adams, Massachusetts · 18795 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account. Each independent account is one row; time runs left to right. The earliest document we hold in each account is ringed. A full list follows the picture.Account 15 documents · 4 reprintsTIME (when each document was published) →Oct 30, 1879Nov 1Nov 3Nov 5Nov 7Nov 9Nov 11Nov 13Reprint · The Canton Advocate (Canton, D.T. [S.D.]) · Image 2 of The Canton advocate (Canton, D.T. [S.D.]), November 6, 1879 · Newspaper, Nov 6, 1879The Canton AdvocateReprint · River Falls Journal (River Falls, Pierce County, Wis.) · Image 2 of River Falls journal (River Falls, Pierce County, Wis.), November 6, 1879 · Newspaper, Nov 6, 1879River Falls JournalReprint · Helena Weekly Herald (Helena, Mont.) · Image 1 of Helena weekly herald (Helena, Mont.), November 13, 1879 · Newspaper, Nov 13, 1879Helena Weekly HeraldReprint · The Manitowoc Pilot (Manitowoc, Wis.) · Image 1 of The Manitowoc pilot (Manitowoc, Wis.), November 13, 1879 · Newspaper, Nov 13, 1879The Manitowoc PilotEarliest found · The Cincinnati Daily Star ([Cincinnati, Ohio]) · Newspaper, Oct 30, 1879EARLIEST FOUNDThe Cincinnati Daily StarNewspapersame text (reprint)Earliest found

Each shape is one document; open it to go to where we found it. The same graph as a list is below.

Why these records are connected

  • 4 copies: the copy detector found the same words in a later document, so it sits in the same row as the account it copies.
  • Why these documents are one case. The case matcher joined them because:
    • The Canton advocate & River Falls journal: the copy detector found the same text in both; they describe the same details; same place, same day
    • The Canton advocate & The Manitowoc pilot: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quotes overlap; they describe the same details (though their days disagree)
    • Helena weekly herald & River Falls journal: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quotes overlap; they describe the same details; same place (though their days disagree)

Every document, as a list

  1. Account 1 5 documents

How to read this

  • Time runs left to right by publication date. Very long empty stretches are cut short (the axis shows how many years were skipped); undated documents sit in their own column.
  • One row per independent account. A reprint, re-upload or cross-post carries the same text, so it stays in its account's row and never counts as a second witness.
  • Earliest found (ringed) is the earliest document we hold for that account. It is not proof of the first telling: an earlier one may exist that we haven't collected.
  • Arrows run from a document to a source it names. A dashed shape is a source a document cites that we haven't found yet; its link searches a public archive for it, and a hit there is a lead, not a confirmation.

About the numbers

  • Only documents we've collected are counted; retellings elsewhere on the web aren't counted yet.
  • Documents are matched by shared text and by the sources they name, by plain rules with no model in the loop. A match can be wrong; tell us.

The deepest rabbit holes →

Where next

Every rabbit hole → · How we tell copies from independent accounts