PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Other / Unknown · Rockingham County, North Carolina · 1855

NC-1855ID case-3d10489752Added to map Oct 8, 2026
Creature
Other / Unknown
When
Oct 28, 1855to the day
Where
Rockingham County, North Carolinato county level
Reports
6 documents1 independent

The account

A farmer in Rockingham County, N.C., reports that a man named Alfred saw a snake-like creature with a human face and rattlesnake body in his still house, leaving a large mark.

Trace the source trail → every document, in time order, and how they connect

We map claims, not creatures: this is what the sources say, not proof. How a case is built

Details

Creature
Other / Unknown
Where
Rockingham County, North Carolina, United States
mapped to county level · from the report's own words
When
Oct 28, 1855
Account
Not first-hand (retold or reported by someone else)
Backed by
1 independent source (6 documents; copies and reprints are not confirmations)
Added to map
Oct 8, 2026
Case id
case-3d10489752

Place lookups use data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL), via Nominatim. All credits

Source trail (5)

Every link goes to where we found the account. The earliest we found is marked; it is the earliest found, not necessarily the original.

  1. Image 1 of The daily dispatch (Richmond [Va.]), November 15, 1855
    Newspaper · 1855-11-15
    Earliest found, not necessarily the original.
  2. Image 1 of The North-Carolinian (Fayetteville [N.C.]), November 24, 1855
    Newspaper · 1855-11-24
  3. Image 1 of Shepherdstown register (Shepherdstown, Va. [W. Va.]), November 24, 1855
    Newspaper · 1855-11-24
Show 2 more sources
  1. Image 2 of Bedford inquirer and chronicle (Bedford, Pa.), November 30, 1855
    Newspaper · 1855-11-30
  2. Image 6 of New-York dispatch (New York [N.Y.]), December 2, 1855
    Newspaper · 1855-12-02

Request a correction or removal of this case

Further reading

Books we have not reproduced: borrow them free at archive.org. Listing a book is not an endorsement of its claims.

Discussion (0)

No comments on this case yet.

Sign in to comment.