PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Down the rabbit hole

Other / Unknown · Rockingham County, North Carolina · 1855

6 documents · 1 independent account

6 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account.

The route

  1. One encounter the reported sighting this case is about
  2. 6 documents that tell it, as we collected them
  3. 1 independent account behind those documents
  4. 5 copies reprints or cross-posts of the same text: not extra witnesses

Copies are not confirmations: thirty papers printing one story is still one account.

Rabbit hole: Other / Unknown · Rockingham County, North Carolina · 18556 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account. Each independent account is one row; time runs left to right. The earliest document we hold in each account is ringed. A full list follows the picture.Account 16 documents · 5 reprintsTIME (when each document was published) →Nov 18, 1855Nov 25Dec 2Dec 9Dec 16Dec 23Dec 30Reprint · The North-Carolinian (Fayetteville [N.C.]) · Image 1 of The North-Carolinian (Fayetteville [N.C.]), November 24, 1855 · Newspaper, Nov 24, 1855The North-CarolinianReprint · Shepherdstown Register (Shepherdstown, Va. [W. Va.]) · Image 1 of Shepherdstown register (Shepherdstown, Va. [W. Va.]), November 24, 1855 · Newspaper, Nov 24, 1855Shepherdstown RegisterReprint · Bedford Inquirer And Chronicle (Bedford, Pa.) · Image 2 of Bedford inquirer and chronicle (Bedford, Pa.), November 30, 1855 · Newspaper, Nov 30, 1855Bedford Inquirer And Ch…Reprint · New-York Dispatch (New York [N.Y.]) · Image 6 of New-York dispatch (New York [N.Y.]), December 2, 1855 · Newspaper, Dec 2, 1855New-York DispatchReprint · Grand River Times (Grand Haven, Mich.) 1851-18?? · Newspaper, Jan 2, 1856Grand River TimesEarliest found · The Daily Dispatch (Richmond [Va.]) · Image 1 of The daily dispatch (Richmond [Va.]), November 15, 1855 · Newspaper, Nov 15, 1855EARLIEST FOUNDThe Daily DispatchNewspapersame text (reprint)Earliest found

Each shape is one document; open it to go to where we found it. The same graph as a list is below.

Why these records are connected

  • 5 copies: the copy detector found the same words in a later document, so it sits in the same row as the account it copies.
  • Why these documents are one case. The case matcher joined them because:
    • New-York dispatch & The North-Carolinian: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quotes overlap; they describe the same details; same place, same day
    • New-York dispatch & The daily dispatch: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quotes overlap; they describe the same details; same place, same day
    • New-York dispatch & Shepherdstown register: the copy detector found the same text in both; they describe the same details; same place, same day
    • New-York dispatch & Bedford inquirer and chronicle: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quotes overlap; they describe the same details; same place, same day
    • The North-Carolinian & The daily dispatch: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; same place, same day
    • The North-Carolinian & Shepherdstown register: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; same place, same day
    • The North-Carolinian & Bedford inquirer and chronicle: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quotes overlap; they describe the same details; same place, same day
    • The daily dispatch & Shepherdstown register: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; same place, same day

Every document, as a list

  1. Account 1 6 documents

How to read this

  • Time runs left to right by publication date. Very long empty stretches are cut short (the axis shows how many years were skipped); undated documents sit in their own column.
  • One row per independent account. A reprint, re-upload or cross-post carries the same text, so it stays in its account's row and never counts as a second witness.
  • Earliest found (ringed) is the earliest document we hold for that account. It is not proof of the first telling: an earlier one may exist that we haven't collected.
  • Arrows run from a document to a source it names. A dashed shape is a source a document cites that we haven't found yet; its link searches a public archive for it, and a hit there is a lead, not a confirmation.

About the numbers

  • Only documents we've collected are counted; retellings elsewhere on the web aren't counted yet.
  • Documents are matched by shared text and by the sources they name, by plain rules with no model in the loop. A match can be wrong; tell us.

The deepest rabbit holes →

Where next

Every rabbit hole → · How we tell copies from independent accounts