PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Down the rabbit hole

Jersey Devil · Swedesboro, New Jersey · 1927

1 document · 1 independent account · 1 cited source we haven't found yet

1 document tells this story. It traces back to 1 independent account. 1 cited source we haven't found yet.

The route

  1. One encounter the reported sighting this case is about
  2. 1 document that tell it, as we collected them
  3. 1 independent account behind those documents
  4. 1 cited source named in the documents: 1 not found yet

Copies are not confirmations: thirty papers printing one story is still one account.

Rabbit hole: Jersey Devil · Swedesboro, New Jersey · 19271 document tells this story. It traces back to 1 independent account. 1 cited source we haven't found yet. Each independent account is one row; time runs left to right. The earliest document we hold in each account is ringed. A full list follows the picture.Account 11 documentTIME (when each document was published) →Aug 4Aug 5Aug 6Aug 7Aug 8Aug 9Aug 10cited, not yet found · Woodbury Daily Times · Newspaper, Aug 10, 1927 · search for itWoodbury Daily Times · not yet foundEarliest found · New Britain Herald (New Britain, Conn.) · Image 2 of New Britain herald (New Britain, Conn.), August 4, 1927 · Newspaper, Aug 4, 1927EARLIEST FOUNDNew Britain HeraldNewspapersame text (reprint)Earliest foundcited, not yet found

Each shape is one document; open it to go to where we found it. The same graph as a list is below.

Why these records are connected

  • Why these documents are one case. The case matcher joined them because:
    • New Britain herald & Bigfoot vs. The Jersey Devil: their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; same place; same year

Every document, as a list

  1. Account 1 1 document

How to read this

  • Time runs left to right by publication date. Very long empty stretches are cut short (the axis shows how many years were skipped); undated documents sit in their own column.
  • One row per independent account. A reprint, re-upload or cross-post carries the same text, so it stays in its account's row and never counts as a second witness.
  • Earliest found (ringed) is the earliest document we hold for that account. It is not proof of the first telling: an earlier one may exist that we haven't collected.
  • Arrows run from a document to a source it names. A dashed shape is a source a document cites that we haven't found yet; its link searches a public archive for it, and a hit there is a lead, not a confirmation.

About the numbers

  • Only documents we've collected are counted; retellings elsewhere on the web aren't counted yet.
  • Documents are matched by shared text and by the sources they name, by plain rules with no model in the loop. A match can be wrong; tell us.

The deepest rabbit holes →

Where next

Every rabbit hole → · How we tell copies from independent accounts