PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Down the rabbit hole

Water Monster · Lake Champlain, Vermont · 1929

6 documents · 3 independent accounts

6 documents tell this story. They trace back to 3 independent accounts.

The route

  1. One encounter the reported sighting this case is about
  2. 6 documents that tell it, as we collected them
  3. 3 independent accounts behind those documents
  4. 3 copies reprints or cross-posts of the same text: not extra witnesses

Copies are not confirmations: thirty papers printing one story is still one account.

Rabbit hole: Water Monster · Lake Champlain, Vermont · 19296 documents tell this story. They trace back to 3 independent accounts. Each independent account is one row; time runs left to right. The earliest document we hold in each account is ringed. A full list follows the picture.Account 1 of 34 documents · 3 reprintsAccount 2 of 31 documentSeparate accountAccount 3 of 31 documentSeparate accountTIME (when each document was published) →Jul 16, 1929Jul 18Jul 20Jul 22Jul 24Reprint · The Indianapolis Times (Indianapolis [Ind.]) · Newspaper, Jul 16, 1929The Indianapolis TimesReprint · The Washington Daily News (Washington, D.C.) · Newspaper, Jul 16, 1929The Washington Daily Ne…Reprint · Imperial Valley Press (El Centro, Calif.) · Newspaper, Jul 16, 1929Imperial Valley PressEarliest found · New Britain Herald (New Britain, Conn.) · Image 12 of New Britain herald (New Britain, Conn.), July 16, 1929 · Newspaper, Jul 16, 1929EARLIEST FOUNDNew Britain HeraldEarliest found · South Bend News-Times (South Bend, Ind.) · Image 4 of South Bend news-times (South Bend, Ind.), July 18, 1929, (PART ONE) · Newspaper, Jul 18, 1929EARLIEST FOUNDSouth Bend News-TimesEarliest found · Der Nordstern (St. Cloud, Minn.) · Image 12 of Der Nordstern (St. Cloud, Minn.), July 25, 1929 · Newspaper, Jul 25, 1929EARLIEST FOUNDDer NordsternNewspapersame text (reprint)Earliest found

Each shape is one document; open it to go to where we found it. The same graph as a list is below.

Why these records are connected

  • 3 copies: the copy detector found the same words in a later document, so it sits in the same row as the account it copies.
  • Why these documents are one case. The case matcher joined them because:
    • New Britain herald & Der Nordstern: a person reviewed them and joined them
    • New Britain herald & South Bend news-times: they describe the same details; same place, same day; one retells the other

Every document, as a list

  1. Account 1 4 documents
  2. Account 2 (Separate account) 1 document
  3. Account 3 (Separate account) 1 document

How to read this

  • Time runs left to right by publication date. Very long empty stretches are cut short (the axis shows how many years were skipped); undated documents sit in their own column.
  • One row per independent account. A reprint, re-upload or cross-post carries the same text, so it stays in its account's row and never counts as a second witness.
  • Earliest found (ringed) is the earliest document we hold for that account. It is not proof of the first telling: an earlier one may exist that we haven't collected.
  • Arrows run from a document to a source it names. A dashed shape is a source a document cites that we haven't found yet; its link searches a public archive for it, and a hit there is a lead, not a confirmation.

About the numbers

  • Only documents we've collected are counted; retellings elsewhere on the web aren't counted yet.
  • Documents are matched by shared text and by the sources they name, by plain rules with no model in the loop. A match can be wrong; tell us.

The deepest rabbit holes →

Where next

Every rabbit hole → · How we tell copies from independent accounts