PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Down the rabbit hole

Water Monster · Door County, Wisconsin · 1883

5 documents · 1 independent account

5 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account.

The route

  1. One encounter the reported sighting this case is about
  2. 5 documents that tell it, as we collected them
  3. 1 independent account behind those documents
  4. 4 copies reprints or cross-posts of the same text: not extra witnesses

Copies are not confirmations: thirty papers printing one story is still one account.

Rabbit hole: Water Monster · Door County, Wisconsin · 18835 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account. Each independent account is one row; time runs left to right. The earliest document we hold in each account is ringed. A full list follows the picture.Account 15 documents · 4 reprintsTIME (when each document was published) →Nov 30, 1884Dec 14Dec 28Jan 11Jan 25Feb 8Reprint · The Brookhaven Leader (Brookhaven, Miss.) · Image 3 of The Brookhaven leader (Brookhaven, Miss.), December 25, 1884 · Newspaper, Dec 25, 1884The Brookhaven LeaderReprint · St. Landry Democrat (Opelousas, La.) · Image 6 of St. Landry democrat (Opelousas, La.), December 27, 1884 · Newspaper, Dec 27, 1884St. Landry DemocratReprint · Wessington Springs Herald (Wessington Springs, Aurora County, Dakota [S.D.]) · Image 5 of Wessington Springs herald (Wessington Springs, Aurora County, Dakota [S.D.]), January 9, 1885 · Newspaper, Jan 9, 1885Wessington Springs Hera…Reprint · The Home Advocate (Farmerville, La.) 1885-1??? · Newspaper, Feb 11, 1885The Home AdvocateEarliest found · Northern Tribune (Cheboygan, Mich.) · Image 8 of Northern tribune (Cheboygan, Mich.), November 27, 1884 · Newspaper, Nov 27, 1884EARLIEST FOUNDNorthern TribuneNewspapersame text (reprint)Earliest found

Each shape is one document; open it to go to where we found it. The same graph as a list is below.

Why these records are connected

  • 4 copies: the copy detector found the same words in a later document, so it sits in the same row as the account it copies.
  • Why these documents are one case. The case matcher joined them because:
    • Northern tribune & The Brookhaven leader: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quotes overlap; they describe the same details; they name the same witness; same place; same year
    • Northern tribune & St. Landry democrat: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; they name the same witness; same place; same year
    • The Brookhaven leader & St. Landry democrat: the copy detector found the same text in both; their quoted passages are nearly identical; they describe the same details; they name the same witness; same place; same year
    • St. Landry democrat & Wessington Springs herald: a person reviewed them and joined them
    • The Brookhaven leader & Wessington Springs herald: a person reviewed them and joined them
    • Northern tribune & Wessington Springs herald: a person reviewed them and joined them
    • Northern tribune & Wessington Springs herald: a person reviewed them and joined them
    • Northern tribune & The Brookhaven leader: the copy detector found the same text in both; they describe the same details; they name the same witness; same place; same year

Every document, as a list

  1. Account 1 5 documents

How to read this

  • Time runs left to right by publication date. Very long empty stretches are cut short (the axis shows how many years were skipped); undated documents sit in their own column.
  • One row per independent account. A reprint, re-upload or cross-post carries the same text, so it stays in its account's row and never counts as a second witness.
  • Earliest found (ringed) is the earliest document we hold for that account. It is not proof of the first telling: an earlier one may exist that we haven't collected.
  • Arrows run from a document to a source it names. A dashed shape is a source a document cites that we haven't found yet; its link searches a public archive for it, and a hit there is a lead, not a confirmation.

About the numbers

  • Only documents we've collected are counted; retellings elsewhere on the web aren't counted yet.
  • Documents are matched by shared text and by the sources they name, by plain rules with no model in the loop. A match can be wrong; tell us.

The deepest rabbit holes →

Where next

Every rabbit hole → · How we tell copies from independent accounts