PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New
New Post
Sign inSign in

Down the rabbit hole

Other Humanoid · Lima, Lima · 1965

2 documents · 1 independent account

2 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account.

The route

  1. One encounter the reported sighting this case is about
  2. 2 documents that tell it, as we collected them
  3. 1 independent account behind those documents
  4. 1 copy reprints or cross-posts of the same text: not extra witnesses

Copies are not confirmations: thirty papers printing one story is still one account.

Rabbit hole: Other Humanoid · Lima, Lima · 19652 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account. Each independent account is one row; time runs left to right. The earliest document we hold in each account is ringed. A full list follows the picture.Account 12 documents · 1 reprintTIME (when each document was published) →Jan 31, 2024Reprint · A collection of reports from the 60's to the late 90's, relaying what can only be described as little greenish men, the majority of these encounters would take place in Puerto Rico & Brazil · Reddit post, Jan 31, 2024A collection of reports…Earliest found · Reddit post · Reddit post, Jan 31, 2024EARLIEST FOUNDReddit postReddit postsame text (reprint)Earliest found

Each shape is one document; open it to go to where we found it. The same graph as a list is below.

Why these records are connected

  • 1 copy: the copy detector found the same words in a later document, so it sits in the same row as the account it copies.

Every document, as a list

  1. Account 1 2 documents

How to read this

  • Time runs left to right by publication date. Very long empty stretches are cut short (the axis shows how many years were skipped); undated documents sit in their own column.
  • One row per independent account. A reprint, re-upload or cross-post carries the same text, so it stays in its account's row and never counts as a second witness.
  • Earliest found (ringed) is the earliest document we hold for that account. It is not proof of the first telling: an earlier one may exist that we haven't collected.
  • Arrows run from a document to a source it names. A dashed shape is a source a document cites that we haven't found yet; its link searches a public archive for it, and a hit there is a lead, not a confirmation.

About the numbers

  • Only documents we've collected are counted; retellings elsewhere on the web aren't counted yet.
  • Documents are matched by shared text and by the sources they name, by plain rules with no model in the loop. A match can be wrong; tell us.

The deepest rabbit holes →

Where next

Every rabbit hole → · How we tell copies from independent accounts