PawCRYPTID BOARDDocument the weird. Investigate the unknown.New

Down the rabbit hole

Bigfoot · Washington, District of Columbia · 1867

7 documents · 1 independent account

7 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account.

The route

  1. One encounter the reported sighting this case is about
  2. 7 documents that tell it, as we collected them
  3. 1 independent account behind those documents
  4. 6 copies reprints or cross-posts of the same text: not extra witnesses

Copies are not confirmations: thirty papers printing one story is still one account.

Rabbit hole: Bigfoot · Washington, District of Columbia · 18677 documents tell this story. They trace back to 1 independent account. Each independent account is one row; time runs left to right. The earliest document we hold in each account is ringed. A full list follows the picture.Account 17 documents · 6 reprintsTIME (when each document was published) →Jul 1865Jan 1866JulJan 1867Jul62 yrsNov 14, 1929Reprint · Daily Ohio Statesman (Columbus, Ohio) · Newspaper, May 24, 1867Daily Ohio StatesmanReprint · The Fairfield Herald (Winnsboro, S.C.) · Newspaper, May 29, 1867The Fairfield HeraldReprint · Daily National Intelligencer (Washington City [D.C.]) · Image 2 of Daily national intelligencer (Washington City [D.C.]), June 5, 1867 · Newspaper, Jun 5, 1867Daily National Intellig…Reprint · The Lancaster Ledger (Lancaster, S.C.) · Newspaper, Jun 12, 1867The Lancaster LedgerReprint · Saint Mary's Beacon (Leonard Town, Md.) · Newspaper, Sep 26, 1867Saint Mary's BeaconReprint · Evening Star (Washington, D.C.) · Newspaper, Nov 14, 1929Evening StarEarliest found · The Weekly Ottumwa Courier (Ottumwa, Iowa) · Newspaper, Feb 16, 1865EARLIEST FOUNDThe Weekly Ottumwa CourierNewspapersame text (reprint)Earliest found

Each shape is one document; open it to go to where we found it. The same graph as a list is below.

Why these records are connected

  • 6 copies: the copy detector found the same words in a later document, so it sits in the same row as the account it copies.

Every document, as a list

  1. Account 1 7 documents

How to read this

  • Time runs left to right by publication date. Very long empty stretches are cut short (the axis shows how many years were skipped); undated documents sit in their own column.
  • One row per independent account. A reprint, re-upload or cross-post carries the same text, so it stays in its account's row and never counts as a second witness.
  • Earliest found (ringed) is the earliest document we hold for that account. It is not proof of the first telling: an earlier one may exist that we haven't collected.
  • Arrows run from a document to a source it names. A dashed shape is a source a document cites that we haven't found yet; its link searches a public archive for it, and a hit there is a lead, not a confirmation.

About the numbers

  • Only documents we've collected are counted; retellings elsewhere on the web aren't counted yet.
  • Documents are matched by shared text and by the sources they name, by plain rules with no model in the loop. A match can be wrong; tell us.

The deepest rabbit holes →

Where next

Every rabbit hole → · How we tell copies from independent accounts